Twitter •  Email

Feb25

Preventing TTC operator assaults: a holistic approach

Posted at 3:25 PM | Filed under Transit | Permalink

Torontoist recently covered TTC's second advertising campaign to make riders aware of the consequences of operator assault.

Being a transit operator is not an easy job, and those who think otherwise seriously do not understand the nature of their work. But that is topic for another blog discussion.

I'm sure many TTC riders have encountered or witnessed vulnerable situations when a rider causes a commotion with an operator whether it is regarding fare disputes, transit service delays, or when the operator intervenes in issues related to passenger safety. I have encountered several instances where a passenger (1) shouted personally demeaning remarks, (2) spat, and (3) tried to provoke a fight at/with a transit operator.

Putting all other issues about the TTC aside, I think we can all agree that no worker deserves to have to succumb to these situations. So what should we and the TTC do about it? Well, I think that this problem requires more holistic solutions. I think what TTC has done is not enough. Here's a look at what's been done, and what more should be done.

What's been done

1. Starting advertising campaigns

If this campaign’s purpose is to bring awareness to the operator assault, then it has accomplished its goal. If the campaign’s purpose is to prevent people from assaulting operators, then it is highly questionable. It’s never effective to prevent someone from doing something simply because “it’s the law,” just like being “tough on crime” has not been effective in curbing crime. The goal is to prevent assaults, not just punish assailants.

I’m also particularly concerned with the quote “Treat TTC workers as you’d want to be treated,” as it should work both ways. Seriously, while I do say that being a TTC operator is a tough gig, there are a rare number of “bad apples” who are confused about what is customer courtesy, and in these cases, TTC surely would not want to passengers to treat operators the way they have treated passengers. See Improving Customer Courtesy below.

2. Installing CCTV and operator screens
TTC is continuing its programme to install cameras on its vehicles, as a means to catch people in the act and to boost overall transit system safety. Also, it intends to install screens to shield operators from passengers.

While I support the installation of these devices, these measures make up only a small component to preventing operator assault. Again, these devices only help to catch and apply a barrier from assailants, they do not prevent the intent of assailants from assaulting them in the first place.

What should be done

If TTC is truly serious about curbing operator assault, they need take measures based on why they’re being assaulted. According to a Commission presentation (Slide 23), the top two motives for operator assault are: fare enforcement (43%) and operating disputes (15%), these two motives make up more than half of all assaults.

A. Mitigate fare enforcement disputes

I assume that most fare enforcement disputes are related to (1) passengers not paying the full cash fare, and (2) abused their use of transfers. Here's what TTC should do:

1. Implement a farecard system

Having a farecard system eliminates the uncertainty that a passenger paid $2.21, $2.75, or whatever. It’s either passengers (1) paid their fare, or (2) didn’t pay their fare. It's easier for operators to make a convincing case to disgruntled passengers when the simply did not pay a fare (in its entirety). I'm sure they can also win over a captive audience of passengers as well should someone decide to not pay altogether.

I recommend that the farecard machine makes a loud recognizable tone if a fare was not properly validated, that way, passengers on board also know that someone did not pay their fare. Allowing passengers on board to understand the fare dispute situation encourage more “eyes on the street vehicle” and allow passengers to invoke shame on the assailant should confrontation arise.

I think the TTC has been very shortsighted for not being on board with PRESTO. Currently, TTC only plans to install them at strategic subway locations where there is a high level of transfers between different transit agencies. If the issue for not implementing the farecard is about money, then it’s time to solicit funding for them to higher levels of government about its more implicit benefits, like this one.

2. Make transfer policies easy and understandable

In addition, TTC’s transfer system is incredibly dated and confusing for passengers. People only understand it through experience. It’s time to eliminate all the confusion by:

  • using a much simpler time-based transfer system
  • implementing a farecard system and eliminating paper transfers altogether.

A time-based transfer allows passengers to travel on any vehicle for up to a certain time (e.g. 2 hours) as displayed on the transfer. This way, there is much less room for interpretation, and certainly less room for misunderstanding and disputes. If the time is up, it's time to pay up. Nice and simple.

This time-based transfer system should also be applied should a farecard system is implemented.

B. Mitigate operating disputes

Operating such a large transit organization is not an easy task, and I'm sure we can all appreciate that the automobile trumps transit in the North American city. While it may be tougher to provide reliable services to customers, it doesn't mean TTC should accept mediocrity. Here are some of the ways to boost the passenger experience, and thus prevent disgruntled passengers.

1. Provide real-time customer information

TTC should be in the business of providing convenience to customers. It must show commitment to recognizing a passenger’s value of time; waiting for a bus that is expected to arrive unpredictably goes against this philosophy. Providing real-time customer information at stops creates a perception to passengers that a bus is never late. If the buses are not perceived to be late, I can assure you that there would be less disgruntled passengers and less assaults on operators.

To be fair, TTC is beginning a program to install (1) a real-time text information system (2) “next vehicle” displays on select transit stops across the system.

Providing customer information conveys to passengers that their time is valuable. We need to keep in mind that a majority of assailants are rational. There is a reason why most assailants get into these situations, and I think most of time time, it's misunderstanding or that they just aren't seen as valued customers.

2. Improve customer courtesy

Treat others the way you’d want to be treated. This is certainly a two-way street between operators and passengers.

TTC needs to rethink its way its services are delivered and listen to its passengers. Let’s end scheduled breaks in the middle of a schedule runs. Let’s end operators’ lack of desire to answer customer questions. These operational practices convey to passengers that their time and patronage is not important.

TTC needs to create systems that:

  • encourage good customer service (e.g. rewards programmes)
  • reinforce what is and the benefits of customer courtesy (e.g. courtesy yields higher ridership and less assaults!)
  • monitor customer courtesy (e.g. mystery shoppers), and
  • create disincentives for poor customer service (e.g. implementing internal customer service improvement programmes, lower salary increases).

TTC also needs to introduce a way to identify operators, whether it may be a name or an operator identification number. That way, passengers have the ability to report good and poor customer service.

C. End rider complacency

While there are many things TTC can do to prevent operator assault, passengers themselves also have a large role to play.

What I find most troubling when these issues arise is the high degree of complacency by passengers. No matter how disruptive the passenger is in the vehicle, people continue to listen to their iPods, continue to read the newspaper, and continue to sleep as if nothing is happening.

I'm not saying that passengers should get involved in situations like this, but what I think would be useful is for passengers to be alert, stare, and let the assailant know that they are being watched. We can all agree that operators don’t deserve to be assaulted, so let’s do our part in supporting and ensuring the safety everyone on board—including operators.

Final Thought

Operator assault is a very serious issue, but it’s time for TTC to really address the issue holistically. To nip the problem in the bud, TTC needs to address the core issues on why operators are being assaulted in the first place.

Majority Retort - [torontoist.com]


Comments (6)

1

Eric

February 25, 2009 8:43 PM

Great article and I agree!

They should really get a fare card system going. It's just much more convenient and efficient.

2

Me

February 25, 2009 9:26 PM

They should increase the fair. Oh wait, they already did that. The TTC sucks.

3

Andrew

February 26, 2009 3:32 AM

You covered the scenario where the rider is at fault but what about where the driver says demeaning things and provokes a fight. Don't try to kid, I have seen it happen. It happened to me.
Some, I imagine, drivers are the innocent victims, some ,I imagine, just get what is coming to them.
Operators can play the bully too and I find it offensive that this point is seldom, if ever, raised.
One question, if someone is bold enough to refuse to pay their fare, how does the automated fare machine help the driver be safe? Don't get me wrong, I am in favour of automated fare boxes even if just so we stop looking like we're running a 3rd World transit system but I don't see how the auto fare box prevents the fight. Believe me, people will argue that the machine is wrong or faulty.
Shame doesn't work on people who have no shame to pull crap anyway.
You're right on about real-time arrival boards but we can't applaud the TTC for implementing this a decade after the rest of the developed world.
The problem at the TTC is employee complacency my friend. The corporation needs to dump the operator's union, right-size their real estate, clear out the management with the archaic thinking, ditch Giambrone - Mr.Wouldn't-it-be-cool-if-the-TTC-did-what-everyone-else-did-in-the-early-90s, get rid of those relics from another century - the streetcars, ditch the low-floor-buses(which lower capacity and cause people to refuse to go up those 2 steps to the raised portion and jam up the front), fire rude and lazy employees, clean up buses and stations, and start thinking about the future in a realistic way. A 25 year plan sounds like by the time they're done we'll end up with obsolete equipment, poorly planned routes and the usual crap because tech and cities change so fast now.

4

Jeet

February 26, 2009 4:39 AM

You are missing the most important thing, Matt. I'm going to reveal this to you because I think you'll be working in this field and public transit is very dear to my heart. I want you to bring about real change so I hope you'll do this: make it more efficient.

All the infrastructure things are nice goodies to have, but if you really want to take people away from their cars and into public transit then do something about the ability of public transit to compete with the private automobile.

Every time I take TORONTO public transit I'm reminded why I gave it up in favour of my own mode of transportation. The TTC has to be one of the most inefficient transit systems in the world relative to the kind of resources they have.

Even in a third world country, like Sri Lanka, you don't find such inefficiency in public transit. As a matter of fact I can reach my destination by a wreck-of-a-bus in Sri Lanka way more faster than I could in the wonderfully facilitated TTC. I spend away my vital minutes in a TTC bus, as the bus driver takes his breaks as he goes according to his inferior schedule, wondering of what I could've done and where I could've been during that time. If you really want the TTC to be a better service that will be appreciated by its riders to the extent that they will not express their frustrations to the driver, then please change the union rules for driver working conditions, as a matter of fact change the rules for all TTC workers. Having worked in the system before, I've seen just how public tax dollars are wasted by an unbelievably lazy and inefficient labour force in the TTC. From the janitor to the driver to the supervisors, the whole TTC system of work needs to be revamped and made efficient and competitive with the car.

As long as the TTC remains a slug that overprotects an undeserving workforce that throws public money down the drain, people who fund the TTC have every right to show their disapproval to the TTC's first point of physical contact, their drivers.

Jeet

5

Leo

February 28, 2009 5:51 PM

Timed transfers are definitely more convenient than the current ones but I think they will just cause another kind of dispute. Passengers will argue that they are only 1 min late. Or, worse, what if the passenger went overtime because the bus arrived late?

I agree customer service needs to be improved, but that will never happen as long as they are government workers. All government workers do is sit there and file their nails while you wait. They won't get fired and their salaries will always increase because of the union. The only disincentive that works is salary-based, but have fun getting the union to agree to it.

Finally, the bottom line for getting people to switch to transit is if it is faster than driving for the same cost. Everything else is secondary.

6

Matt

March 2, 2009 11:26 AM

Thanks for the comments everyone.

Andrew,
Yes, there are surely a few 'bad apples' at the TTC, and they themselves may be the ones who are provoking the violence. This is why I think the introduction of better customer service measures (see Improve customer courtesy) will work to improve those conditions. Those who aren't able to meet expections should see themselves after a number of trials with severance cheques.

Yes, perhaps the union and management relations have been making it difficult for TTC to introduce real change, but I don't think but that doesn't mean anybody should be sitting around and accepting things as they are.

At the same time, I don't think abolishing the union will automatically solve the problems. Plus, I think it's a 'pipe dream' to ever think that the union could be disbanded. Instead, the solution is to seriously work together to find holistic ways to improve customer service and reduce rider agitation.

Jeet,
I don't think it's fair to compare Toronto to places like Sri Lanka. There are a number of factors that make transit in cities in Sri Lanka much more competitive to the car (e.g. density, standard of living, etc).

However, I do like your idea of changing the union rules for all TTC workers. Let's start rewarding people for good service, and introducing penalties to those TTC staff who are not compliant with providince convenience to riders.

Leo,
Usually, time-based transfers grant riders a very generous time allotment-- usually two hours. I presume that most riders should be able to finish their trip in two hours. Surely there may be days (e.g. when the subway shuts down) when it may cause massive delays-- and in which case, exceptions should be granted. In other cases, I don't think excuses from riders should be granted.

I don't think it's fair and appropriate to associate all government workers as being lazy and complacent-- and this is the kind of mindset that we certainly don't need. I believe that unions have their place in organizations, but it's a matter of making real concessions that benefit both workers and management.

What we do need is for the TTC to introduce incentives for workers to deliver good customer service, and issue penalties to those who don't. I don't think these demands are unreasonable, and if the union triggers a strike because of these reasonable demands, then I invite them to strike.

Should the TTC workers strike, management should then introduce a massive public relations campaign to disclose the unreasonable objections by the union, and perhaps we can get a high volume of public backing towards introducing the measures I suggested.

Lastly, I agree with you, we need to provide transit that is competitive to the car, and hopefully we can get there.


Post a comment